Analysis results

Q3 NPS verbatims — Enterprise

JRSigned in as Jordan Reyes
Executive summary

128 feedback items · 5 themes · Jul 28, 2026

NegativeHigh severity

Export reliability and mobile approvals dominate enterprise complaints, while support quality remains the strongest positive signal.

Overall sentiment

negative

Highest severity

high

Themes identified

5

Themes

Export reliability at scale

14 mentions

NegativeHigh severity

Customers with larger datasets consistently hit failures when exporting, which blocks downstream reporting workflows they depend on weekly.

Supporting evidence

Exporting to CSV fails every time my dataset is over 10k rows.
I had to split the report into four exports to get anything out.

Recommended action

Move exports to an async job queue with email delivery, and add a progress state for datasets above 5k rows.

Onboarding friction

9 mentions

NegativeMedium severity

New teams describe a multi-week ramp with no guided setup. Documentation assumes prior familiarity with the data model.

Supporting evidence

Onboarding took our team three weeks. There is no guided setup.
The docs assume you already know the data model.

Recommended action

Ship a five-step guided setup checklist with sample data, and rewrite the first docs page around concepts rather than fields.

Support quality

6 mentions

PositiveLow severity

Support is a recurring bright spot. Customers cite fast response times and answers that resolve the issue on first contact.

Supporting evidence

Support has been genuinely excellent. Two-hour response times, real answers.

Recommended action

Use support transcripts as a source for the docs rewrite, and highlight response-time SLAs in renewal conversations.

Mobile usability

11 mentions

NegativeHigh severity

Approval workflows are commonly performed away from a desk, but tables overflow on small screens and actions are unreachable.

Supporting evidence

The mobile view is unusable. Tables overflow and I cannot approve requests from my phone.

Recommended action

Prioritise a responsive approvals view: card layout under 768px with a single primary action per row.

Renewal pricing transparency

4 mentions

NegativeMedium severity

Unannounced renewal increases are triggering competitive evaluations, particularly among procurement stakeholders.

Supporting evidence

Pricing jumped 40% at renewal with no warning. We are evaluating alternatives.

Recommended action

Introduce a 90-day renewal notice with a clear change summary, and cap year-over-year increases for multi-year accounts.

Was this analysis helpful?

Your rating feeds the evaluation metrics.